John D. Chitty
“The Misadventures of Captain Headknowledge” -- Rescuing victims of villainous theology since 2006. "I'm from Geneva, and I'm here to help!"
Join 526 other subscribers
Blogroll
- Aimee Byrd
- Aquila Report
- Daniel B. Wallace Blog
- Fundamentally Reformed
- Good Faith Podcast
- Green Baggins
- Heidelblog
- Humble Theology
- King James Only?
- Ligonier Ministries Blog
- Mid Cities Presbyterian Church Library
- My Only Comfort
- Post Tenebras Lux
- Rachel Green Miller
- Reformation21 Blog
- Reformed Bibliophile
- The Holy Post
- The Monroe Doctrine
- The Riddleblog
- This Day in Presbyterian History
- Valiant for Truth
Latest Instagrams
@jdougchit tweets
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Mid Cities OPC Sermon Podcast
- Ascribe Ye Strength unto God (Psalm 68:34a) January 22, 2023On Sunday, January 22, 2023, Rev. Robert Mossotti preached, "Ascribe Ye Strength unto God" from Psalm 68:34a. mcopc.org/podcast
- The Son Who Did Learn Obedience (1 Kings 2:1-12) January 20, 2023On Sunday, January 15, 2023, Pastor Joe Troutman preached, "The Son Who Did Learn Obedience" from 1 Kings 2:1-12. "Jesus Christ, the Son of God, co-equal in power with the Father and the Holy Spirit, learned obedience to his Father in order to save sinners." 1. Commands He Couldn't Keep (vs. 1-4) 1 When David's time to die drew […]
- The Horns of a Dilemma (1 Kings 1:41-53) January 19, 2023On Sunday, January 8, 2023, Pastor Joe Troutman preached "The Horns of a Dilemma" from 1 Kings 1:41-53. "The Lord's King sits on the Throne and even his enemies pay homage to him." 1. Jonathan's Report (vs. 41-47) 41 Adonijah and all the guests who were with him heard it as they finished feasting. And when Joab heard the sound o […]
- The Long-Awaited King (Matthew 1:1-17) January 16, 2023On Sunday, December 18, 2022, Pastor Joe Troutman preached "The Long-Awaited King" from Matthew 1:1-17. 1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. 2 Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, 3 and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tama […]
- The True King Has Come! (Matthew 2:1-12) January 1, 2023On Sunday, January 1, 2023, Pastor Joe Troutman preached, "The True King Has Come!" from Matthew 2:1-12. Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we saw his star when it rose and have come to worship […]
Categories
- Anti-Intellectualism (7)
- Atheism (1)
- Bible as Literature (1)
- Biblical Archaeology (1)
- Biblical Commentary (104)
- Blog Features (22)
- Books (120)
- Calvinism (1)
- Captain Headknowledge: The Early Years (39)
- Catechism (69)
- Cessationism (1)
- Christmas (1)
- Church History (251)
- Anabaptism (13)
- Heretics (2)
- Arius (1)
- Docetism (1)
- Gnosticism (1)
- John Calvin (26)
- Jonathan Edwards (1)
- Martin Luther (41)
- Protestant Reformation (6)
- Restorationism (1)
- Rev. John Brown of Haddington (22)
- Thinking About Church History (75)
- Trueman, Carl (1)
- Clary, Glen (1)
- Creeds (4)
- Nicene Creed (1)
- Culture and Politics (46)
- Bowe Bergdahl (1)
- Constantinism (1)
- Feminism (1)
- Homosexuality (5)
- Marvel Comics (1)
- Star Wars (2)
- Two Kingdoms (8)
- Easter (1)
- Eastern Orthodoxy (4)
- Hank Hanegraaff (1)
- humor (23)
- Islam (5)
- J. Gresham Machen (1)
- Live Blogging (2)
- Master, Jonathan (2)
- Michael Card (1)
- Miracles (1)
- N.T. Wright (1)
- Office Hours (1)
- OPC, Galatians, Grace, Faith, Justification, Repentance, Presbyterian, Preaching, Sermon (1)
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church (13)
- Personal (71)
- Phil Ryken (1)
- Podcast (15)
- Christ the Center (4)
- East of Eden (1)
- Janet Mefferd (2)
- Protestantism (336)
- Baptist (68)
- Evangelicalism (151)
- Fundamentalism (48)
- J. Frank Norris (10)
- KJVOx (2)
- Peter Ruckman (3)
- Reformed Theology (223)
- Canons of Dort (1)
- Doctrines of Grace (48)
- Effectual Call (5)
- Foreknowledge (1)
- Particular Redemption (4)
- Perseverance of the Saints (3)
- Radical Corruption (1)
- Total Depravity (7)
- Presbyterian (86)
- Toward a Modern Reformation (60)
- Westminster Confession of Faith (12)
- Westminster Theological Seminary (16)
- Radio (39)
- Etc. (1)
- Grace To You (2)
- Issues (1)
- Redeemer Broadcasting (1)
- White Horse Inn (17)
- Reformed (1)
- Reliability of the Bible (77)
- King James Version (34)
- Textual Criticism (24)
- Roman Catholicism (3)
- Saluting Real Captains Headknowledge (71)
- Science (6)
- Theological Issues (382)
- Apologetics (17)
- Campbellism (1)
- Christocentricity (69)
- Christology (9)
- Complementarianism (4)
- Creationism (2)
- Ecumenism (2)
- Eschatology (23)
- Harold Camping (10)
- Evangelism (7)
- Federal Vision (1)
- Glory of God (1)
- Gospel (39)
- Hermeneutics (20)
- Hyper-Calvinism (1)
- Inerrancy (11)
- Inspiration (18)
- Justification (14)
- Modernist Liberalism (6)
- Moral Law (17)
- The Ten Commandments (11)
- Original Sin (1)
- Patriarchalism (1)
- Postmodern Liberalism (21)
- Rob Bell (13)
- Practical Application (42)
- Suffering (2)
- Universalism (6)
- Word of Faith Movement (6)
- Worship (140)
- Music for Mind and Heart (89)
- Preaching (34)
- Sermon Notes (6)
- Regulative Principle (4)
- Sacramentology (18)
- Trinity Hymnal (9)
- Uncategorized (79)
- Video (63)
- Watcman Fellowship (2)
- William Dennison (2)
John D. Davis on the “Sons of God”
A Dictionary of the Bible, 2nd Edition (1903), John D. Davis, editor
The following is a fascinating Bible Dictionary entry of the biblical useage of the phrase “Sons of God,” with a special treatment on the various interpretations thereof in Genesis 6. The editor of this Bible Dictionary, John D. Davis, was a member of the faculty of the “Old Princeton.” B.B. Warfield himself even contributed a few of the entries in this dictionary as well. It’s written on a very accessible level for laymen to grasp, and now that I have an antiquarian copy of the 1903 Second edition, I’ll be consulting it in my own Bible study, and most likely, this will not be the last you read from it on this blog, as well.
Sons of God
A Dictionary of the Bible by John D. David, Ph.D. D.D., LL.D.
Professor of Oriental and Old Testament Literature in the Theological Seminary, Princeton, N. J.
1898, 1903 by The Trustees of the Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath-School Work.
Pages 701-702
Worshipers and beneficiaries of God…Such was its common Semitic meaning in early times. There is abundant reason to believe that this is its signification in the celebrated passage where it first appears in the Bible. “It came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose” (Gen. 6:1-2).
Three interpretations have been proposed. The Sons of God are:
The first interpretation has no longer any advocates.
In favor of the second, it is asserted that the term denotes angels everywhere else in the O.T. (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7; cf. a similar expression Ps. 29:1; 89:6; RV margin; but not Dan. 3:25); that the designation describes angels according to their nature, whereas the ordinary word for angels,mal’akim, messengers, refers to their official employment; and that this interpretation is confirmed by Jude 6 and 2 Pet. 2:4. But that the term relates to the nature of angels lacks proof; it is quite as natural that it should describe angels as worshipers of God. As to the passages in Jude and Peter, to cite them is begging the question, since exegetes point out other references, as Is. 24:21-23. And unless the title be restricted to the special form which it has in the passage under discussion, it is not true that the term denotes angels in all other places where it occurs in the O.T.
Taking a broader survey, and examining Semitic literature other than Hebrew, one observes the same fact. Many a Babylonian styled himself the son of the god whom he worshiped and upon whom he relied for protection and care.
Furthermore, the opinion that the title in Gen. 6:2 means angels is not the earliest view, so far as the records go. The earliest attested interpretation, that of the Samaritan version, regarded the sons of God as men; and later when the angelic theory arose, it was the opinion of a particular school among the Jews, while the more influential party in religious matters still taught that the sons of God were men.
Icon of Seth
The interpretation that the sons of God in Gen. 6:2 were pious people, the worshipers of the true God, more especially that they were the godly descendants of Adam through Seth, whose genealogy is given in Gen. 5, is not only in accordance with Semitic, and particularly biblical, usage of the designation, as already shown, but it is consistent with the context. The sons of God are contrasted with the daughters of men, that is of other men. So Jeremiah says, “God did set signs in Israel and among men;” and the English version supplies the word other before men, in order to bring out the sense (Jer. 32:20). Likewise the psalmist says that the wicked “are not in trouble as men; neither are they plagued like men;” and again the English version supplies the word other (Ps. 73:5). After the same manner Gen. 6:1-2 may be read: “When mankind began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters of other men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose.” The meaning of the writer is that when men began to increase in number, the worshipers of God so far degenerated that in choosing wives for themselves they neglected character, and esteemed beauty of face and form above piety. The offspring of these marriages were perhaps stalwart and violent. Mixture of race in marriage often produces physical strength in the descendants, and lack of religion in the parents is apt to be reproduced in the children. The intermarriage of the sons of God and the daughters of men was offensive in the sight of God. Sentence was pronounced against the wrongdoers. The penalty is not denounced on angels, who were not only implicated, but were the chief sinners, if the sons of God were angels. The punishment is pronounced against man only. Man, not angels, had offended.
Sons of God everywhere in Scripture, from the earliest to the latest times, means the worshipers and beneficiaries of God, both among mortal in immortal beings. But the content of this idea did not remain the same through the ages. It became larger with increasing knowledge of the riches of God. It enlarged, for example, at the time when the Israelites were delivered from Egypt.
Heretofore the title had emphasized a filial relation of men to God, their dependence upon him for protection and care, and their duty of reverence and obedience. Now God formally accepts the obligations which implicitly devolve on him. The content of the title was further enlarged through the teaching of Jesus Christ. He took truths already known, shed light on them, and connected them with this designation.
Share this:
Like this: